Mental substrate of lingual units in the English-speaking limericks

doi:10.17223/24109266/13/1

Эндаумент фонд ТГУ!
Впиши своё имя в историю университета
- Сделать пожертвование -

Add to "Quick Collection"

Description	Size	Format
Mental substrate of lingual units in the English-speaking limericks	1014 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	Read	Download
DOI Доступ к ресурсу на сайте издателя			10.17223/24109266/13/1

Title: Mental substrate of lingual units in the English-speaking limericks
Creator: Gnezdechko, O. N.
Date: 2019
DOI: 10.17223/24109266/13/1
Description: A lot of scientists took up engaging in the profound study of the humor discourse. However, less scientists focused their attention on the psycholinguistic nature of the limerick as a small genre of the author’s joke. Nevertheless, the problem of their lingvocreative nature of forming and functioning should not be neglected. The analysis of the linguistic corpus was drawn on the basis of the English-speaking limericks written by D. Morin, E. Lir, L. Rid, A. Belkin, E.O. Parrot, N. Jonson, K. Doman, A.P. Kox, I. Asimov, J. Bryant, L. Marsh, M. Dixit and I. Volt. Highlighted here is the key role of the lingvocreative means of secondary formations in Modern English limericks. Of special emphasis is the universal law of least speech effort. Need for linguistic economy provides communicative effectiveness on account of leasteffort principle. In the English-speaking limericks compression is realized through the reduction of the letter composition of the words, functional transposition of graphemes and borrowings. Borrowing of more ompressed lexical units from one language into the other for the matter of euphemization and formal association with the linguistic economy. As a result, psycholinguistic specificities of the linguistic manipulation of two types - persuasion and hypnotic suggestion - have been elicited and systematized. The paper provides interesting theoretical and applied implications with regard to the functional asymmetry of the hemispheres (the left hemisphere discrete, the right one - analogous), in the framework of NLP distinguished are three types of “representative” systems with analogues formed in them: visual, auditory and kinesthetic ones. The analogous systems define the individual master way of the human experience representation. In theory of NLP the human background is represented by optical sensation (visual system), sound combinations (auditory) and sensations (kinesthetics). One of the means to reveal the individuum’s master perception canal turns out to be analysis of the vocabulary used. Majority of learners perceive torrents of information via various canals. To effectively interact between learners they should use the perception canal they share in common. The human proprioceptive sense reveals through the predicates used in the speech. The communicants get to understand each other by means of a particular predicative set. Therefore, as a psychical means of the reality display and the tool of the communicative and volition action, language unit mediates between a person and a community. The socio-mediated function mostly finds itself in the usual interpretation of speech signs.