Сравнительный анализ наукометрических показателей журналов Math-Net.ru и eLibrary.ru

doi:10.17223/19988605/56/12

Эндаумент фонд ТГУ!
Впиши своё имя в историю университета
- Сделать пожертвование -

Add to "Quick Collection"

Description	Size	Format
Сравнительный анализ наукометрических показателей журналов Math-Net.ru и eLibrary.ru	696 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	Read	Download
DOI Доступ к ресурсу на сайте издателя			10.17223/19988605/56/12

#наукометрия

#граф цитирования журналов

#рейтинговые показатели

#Спирмена коэффициент ранговой корреляции

Title: Сравнительный анализ наукометрических показателей журналов Math-Net.ru и eLibrary.ru
Title: Comparative analysis of scientometrics indicators of journals Math-Net.ru and eLibrary.ru
Creator: Печников, Андрей Анатольевич
Date: 2021
DOI: 10.17223/19988605/56/12
Description: Для верификации официальных показателей научной результативности предлагается использовать интернет-площадки, объединяющие ученых в конкретной области знаний. Подход продемонстрирован для показателей журналов по математике eLibrary.ru и Math-Net.ru. Из нескольких рейтинговых оценок eLibrary.ru определена оценка, которая наилучшим образом соответствует показателям значимости в Math-Net.ru, тем самым давая инструментальное обоснование такого ранжирования в eLibrary.ru. The formal performance indicators of scientific activity, recognized by science governing bodies, directly or indirectly determine salaries, incentives, career advancement and grant opportunities for most scientists. Despite constant criticism against the governing bodies, it is they who approve these indicators, while other stakeholders (heads of institutes, universities and foundations, scientists themselves) are forced to agree with these indicators, and even adapt to them. In Russia and other countries, a family of impact factors is used as indicators. They are formed on the basis of data obtained from large online platforms that take into account mutual citation of papers. Moreover, most researchers dealing with this problem agree that assessments of the activities of organizations, scientific journals and scientists themselves, based on scientometric indicators, must be confirmed by expert evaluations. Note that the collective expert evaluation procedure itself is very complicated, often time-consuming and costly, and is also subject to criticism. As a basis for expert evaluation of official indicators, this paper proposes the use of existing Internet platforms, informally and voluntarily uniting scientists in a specific field of knowledge and possessing a sufficiently large amount of information on papers and citations on a given topic. If we have official performance indicators of scientific activities and a certain Internet platform, then the main question becomes, can such platform serve as a means for verifying indicators recognized by science governing bodies? This approach is demonstrated by comparing the indicators of scientific journals in the field of mathematics and some areas of its application. The Science Index and the average score based on public examination conducted by scientific e-library eLIBRARY.RU served as official indicators. The features of All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru were used to form an expert assessment. It is shown that Math-Net.Ru journals make up a significant part of mathematics journals in eLIBRARY.RU. Moreover, many Math-Net.Ru journals have such important properties as absence of monopolization of articles and references in Math-Net.Ru, which is behind the high reputation of this online resource. For the constructed citation graph of Math-Net.Ru journals, indicators such as Page Rank and eigenvector centrality, measuring the significance of vertices, corresponding to the journals in the graph, were calculated. Further, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between Math-Net.Ru indicators and eLIBRARY.RU indicators. It showed that Page Rank in Math-Net.Ru has a strong positive statistical correlation with the average score obtained from public examination conducted by eLIBRARY.RU. The outcome of the research suggests that the use of data obtained from mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru allows to determine (from several eLIBRARY.RU rankings) such an assessment that best matches the significance indicators in Math-Net.Ru, thereby providing an instrumental justification for such eLIBRARY.RU ranking.

Relationships: Show Relationship Browser for this Object
collection(s): Журналы ТГУ
Identifier: смотреть в электронном каталоге НБ ТГУ
Type: статьи в журналах
Source: Вестник Томского государственного университета. Управление, вычислительная техника и информатика. 2021. № 56. С. 112-121
Language: rus

Created: 27-10-2021

420 Visitors

256 Hits

181 Downloads

Журналы ТГУ Сравнительный анализ наукометрических показателей журналов Math-Net.ru и eLibrary.ru